While we focused on the top 10 recovery myths, there are many others that continue to perpetuate misunderstandings about addiction and recovery. These myths may not have made the final list, but they’re still worth addressing. Here are three recovery myths that deserve a deeper dive:

“Addiction Is Just a Lack of Willpower”

This myth is one of the oldest and most harmful misconceptions about addiction. It reduces a complex medical condition to a simple character flaw, stigmatizing those who struggle and preventing many from seeking help.

Addiction is not a moral failing. It’s a chronic disease that affects the brain’s reward system, decision-making processes, and impulse control. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), addiction alters the brain in fundamental ways, making it extremely challenging for individuals to stop using substances without help.

The willpower myth often discourages people from understanding the biological and psychological factors that contribute to addiction. Genetics, environmental influences, and mental health conditions all play significant roles. For example, studies show that genetics account for about 40-60% of a person’s vulnerability to addiction.

If addiction were purely a matter of willpower, we wouldn’t need treatment programs, therapy, or recovery communities. People in recovery demonstrate immense strength and resilience, often working harder to maintain sobriety than those who have never struggled with addiction.

“Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) Isn’t ‘Real’ Recovery”

Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) is a controversial topic in some recovery circles, largely due to the stigma surrounding it. This myth suggests that individuals using medications like methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone are not truly sober, perpetuating a harmful divide within the recovery community.

MAT is a proven, evidence-based approach to treating substance use disorders. Organizations like the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) endorse MAT as an effective way to reduce cravings, prevent relapse, and support long-term recovery.

Critics argue that MAT is simply replacing one substance with another. However, this perspective fails to recognize the difference between therapeutic use under medical supervision and recreational drug use. MAT medications stabilize brain chemistry, reduce withdrawal symptoms, and allow individuals to focus on rebuilding their lives.

Recovery is not a one-size-fits-all journey, and MAT has helped countless people achieve sobriety and stability. Dismissing this approach as “not real recovery” only serves to alienate those who benefit from it.

“If You Relapse, You’ve Failed”

Relapse is often misunderstood as a definitive failure rather than a common part of the recovery process. This myth creates unnecessary guilt and shame, making it harder for individuals to recommit to their recovery journey.

According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), addiction relapse rates are similar to those of other chronic illnesses like diabetes or hypertension—between 40-60%. Recovery is not linear, and setbacks are a natural part of managing any chronic condition.

Relapse doesn’t mean someone isn’t trying hard enough or that treatment didn’t work. Instead, it’s an opportunity to identify triggers, reassess coping strategies, and make adjustments to the recovery plan. For many, relapse is a wake-up call that reinforces their commitment to sobriety.

The myth of failure also overlooks the resilience it takes to get back on track after a relapse. Every attempt at recovery builds strength, knowledge, and experience, bringing people closer to long-term sobriety.